http://2buildings1blog.org/pulitzer/2009/05/20/social-media-musings/ The Pulitzer Foundation for the Arts and Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis have joined together to create the Contemporary-Pulitzer blog which, for the first time, combines the perspectives of two separate institutions with differing missions within the same blog. Fri, 02 Jul 2010 20:47:35 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://2buildings1blog.org/pulitzer/2009/05/20/social-media-musings/comment-page-1/#comment-12110 Rachel Sun, 24 May 2009 01:50:12 +0000 http://2buildings1blog.org/pulitzer/2009/05/20/social-media-musings/#comment-12110 Thanks for your comment. We're actually in the process of reconsidering the structure of our website - we've outgrown the current framework. It's gotten to a point where it's difficult to find all of the information we now have available online. I really appreciate your feedback - it will be helpful as we continue to plan. Thanks for your comment. We’re actually in the process of reconsidering the structure of our website – we’ve outgrown the current framework. It’s gotten to a point where it’s difficult to find all of the information we now have available online. I really appreciate your feedback – it will be helpful as we continue to plan.

]]> http://2buildings1blog.org/pulitzer/2009/05/20/social-media-musings/comment-page-1/#comment-12094 lisa Sat, 23 May 2009 18:34:13 +0000 http://2buildings1blog.org/pulitzer/2009/05/20/social-media-musings/#comment-12094 I don't understand why the Pulitzer just doesn't get it?? Yes, your website is very 2.0, but does it work? No, every time I go to it to look at "the space" I feel like I'm playing or looking at an adolescence video game of some sort. Why do some organizations like the pulitzer feel that 2.0 website jazz is always good? Pictures and information should be key and you have that, but it's all mucked up with this interface that's just not right. It looks good, I guess, but it doesn't really add to the experience of the organization, I feel it just annoys more. The interface is not fluid like others. I don’t understand why the Pulitzer just doesn’t get it?? Yes, your website is very 2.0, but does it work? No, every time I go to it to look at “the space” I feel like I’m playing or looking at an adolescence video game of some sort. Why do some organizations like the pulitzer feel that 2.0 website jazz is always good? Pictures and information should be key and you have that, but it’s all mucked up with this interface that’s just not right. It looks good, I guess, but it doesn’t really add to the experience of the organization, I feel it just annoys more. The interface is not fluid like others.

]]>