As Rachel discussed in the blog last week, the Pulitzer hosted a Minimalism Symposium this past weekend. The program was a great success, with approximately 15 scholars, artists, and writers flying in from across the country to participate. I had the opportunity to listen to the walk-through of both the Pulitzer and SLAM’s exhibitions, and to hear the ensuing discussions that took place among the participants.
One of the issues that arose was the physical presentation of Minimalist works in the gallery spaces, and the unique challenges that come with the territory. Minimalist art is by definition simplified to essential elements of content and form — artists try to present their work without any distractions, including those of composition, theme, etc. Thus, curators must carefully take into account small details in the galleries (architectural and otherwise) that may interfere with how a viewer perceives a work of Minimal art.
For example, in this picture of the Symposium walk-through, you can see extraneous (but NECESSARY) elements of the architecture that could impact a visitor’s experience of the Gober sinks: floor grates, a fire alarm announcer, an exit sign, and a square plaque on the wall that is used to monitor gallery temperature.
In this image, you can see how the lines in the concrete floor pavers could affect the view of Roni Horn’s Gold Mats Paired (for Ross and Felix).
Similar challenges were noted with installing SLAM’s galleries, including working around baseboards, air vents, and ceiling beams.
This is just one example of all that curators must take into account when planning and installing a show — and it was not something I had thought about until our own Minimalism exhibition came about.